Excerpt from:  FAS Talk
.
December 21, 2009

(Too Many) Rules for Effective Waves

When you need 16 (and counting) published rules to achieve effective Google Wave group collaboration, it’s simply not ready for mainstream adoption.
Rules

The Shiny Wave blog recently published a summary of the Rules for Effective Waves (which were culled from a public wave of the same title).  As I read through the list of rules, I found myself generally agreeing with all of them.  But I was also thinking, this is way too complicated.

Google Wave offers the beginnings of a new communications paradigm.  But as I have said before, GW is not quite ready for mainstream adoption.

Today, GW is a great place for forward-looking techno- and social-media-geeks to experiment and ponder.  In that context, GW can already be very effective.  But try bringing in an entire organization—the executive team, the sales team, the marketing folks, engineering, support, and so on—and asking them to learn 16 rules (along with a dozen or so others that are not in this list) for using the platform effectively.  It ain’t gonna fly.

I remain a GW fan and believe it is an important new technology.  It’s just not ready for prime time.

Comments
.

RE: (Too Many) Rules for Effective Waves

My conclusion is that wave is iffy at best

It's hard for me to say whether it will be important or not. Gmail was obviously good when it debuted and has only gotten better. Chrome is a similar story. And search is maybe the best example of all time.

With all of those, you could see an immediate use. With wave, I'm not sure what that use is yet.

.
.

RE: (Too Many) Rules for Effective Waves

The value of wave is in the platform

The public wave UI is feeble.  No argument there.  If that were all there were to it, Google Wave would be an interesting experiment destined to fade into obscurity.  But GW is much more than that.

GW defines an underlying platform and messaging protocol that is--or at least promises to become--an important foundation for many applications.  The fact that GW is not even generally available and yet it tied with email in a recent poll for best collaboration platform suggest there is something to it.

Give GW another year or two to mature and for developers to start building on the underlying platform.  We'll see not only new and much more capable GW clients, but entirely new classes of application functionality layered on top of the GW protocol.

.

Syndication OptionsRSS (Rich Site Summary) Feed Atom Feed OPML (Outline Processor Language) Feed MYST-ML (MyST Markup Language) Content Feed MS-Office Smart Tag Subscription